Search for: "Erie et al v. AT" Results 1 - 20 of 118
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2016, 8:25 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here: 2015 12 14 Petition for Writ; Citizens Against Casino Gambling in Erie County et al v Chaudhuri et al US Cert Opp Lower court materials here. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 11:21 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Chaudhuri: 2015 12 14 Petition for Writ; Citizens Against Casino Gambling in Erie County et al v Chaudhuri et al Questions presented: 1. [read post]
7 Sep 2015, 6:06 pm by Daily Record Staff
Kivitz, personal representative of the Estate of Seymour Baden, appellant, granting summary judgment in favor Erie Insurance Exchange, appellee, and entering a declaratory judgment ... [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 4:44 pm
Body: The Erie Times-News reports that on August 4 federal district judge Sean McLaughlin has scheduled testimony in the Minard Run Oil Company et al v. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 6:35 am
Temporary assignment not the same as appointment to a “position”Miller, et al, v. [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 1:54 am
Because Erie approved the settlement with the tortfeasor, the Court noted that Erie was bound by that settlement and, therefore, liability was not at issue. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 3:54 am
Discovery of public employer’s electronic records in federal litigationPritchard, et al v County of Erie and others, 546 F.3d 222 Pritchard obtained an order from a federal district court justice compelling Erie County to produce certain electronic communications – e-mails - between County officials and an attorney employed by the County. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 4:15 am
Challenging a layoff determinationMatter of Janet Arnold, et al v Erie County Med. [read post]
6 Jun 2021, 3:26 pm
  Still waiting for the court's decision of my client's motion to dismiss the THILL 13014, LLC et al. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2021, 3:26 pm
  Still waiting for the court's decision of my client's motion to dismiss the THILL 13014, LLC et al. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 1:34 pm by Donald Dinnie
An American court has confirmed that government shutdown orders did not constitute ‘direct physical loss’ that would trigger an indemnity under the commercial insurance held by a group of restaurants (in Rose’s 1 LLC et al v Erie Insurance Exchange). [read post]